America-Israel Patent Law Blog

Observations on patents and other IP from a dual-licensed practitioner

,

USPTO Issues Mea Culpa: Some Patent Application Information Made Available Too Early (And Not Through Wikileaks)

Uh-Oh This morning, during my daily check of correspondence from the USPTO on private PAIR, I found a fascinating letter, the text of which is reprinted below.  Turns out that the USPTO goofed, and enabled some patent application data to become publicly available on November 11 when that data wasn’t supposed to become available until November 18.  The data wasn’t actually posted on PAIR; it was posted on a third party web site, then removed on November 15 and reposted on November 18, when it also became available on PAIR. 

As the USPTO notes, the number of applications affected by the error is likely quite small, and the effect will be limited to corresponding applications filed outside the USA from November 11 through November 17 without a priority claim to the erroneously disclosed application.  Personally, I’m curious if ANY foreign applications were or will be adversely affected by the premature disclosure. 

What is impressive is that the USPTO came clean regarding its mistake relatively quickly: it seems that it only took about two weeks from the time the USPTO discovered the mistake to the time it mailed letters to all 6015 affected applicants, including the Thanksgiving hiatus.  (A random sampling of the PAIR records for several of those applications indicates that all the letters were mailed November 30.)  The USPTO could have stayed silent about this; had it not said anything, this story might have stayed buried for a long time, if not permanently.  Hat tip to Commissioner David Kappos and his staff for this one.

The text of the letter sent to affected applicants is as follows:

Notice of Erroneous Early Release of Patent Application Information on November 11, 2010

On November 11, 2010, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), unintentionally and as a result of a processing error, made available to subscribers of patent application data the patent application publications that were not scheduled to publish under 35 U.S.C. 122(b) until November 18, 2010. The USPTO's subscription service allows a member of the public to obtain copies of all patents or application publications from the USPTO on the date of grant or publication for a fee. One subscriber who had access to the early-published data made these premature patent application publications available on its free Web service, known as Free Patents Online, on November 11, 2010 – one week prior to the scheduled publication date. At the USPTO's request, the subscriber removed access to the patent application publications dated November 18, 2010 on November 15, 2010 until November 18, 2010. While the premature release of application information on November 11, 2010, is not considered a publication of such applications under 35 U.S.c. 122(b), the USPTO acknowledges that there are potential international ramifications in certain very limited circumstances such as where an applicant whose application information was released early did not file a foreign application within the Paris Convention priority period but did file in a foreign country between November 11, 2010 and November 18,2010.

The USPTO did not post the publications on its Web site until November 18,2010, and it did not provide access to the public Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) System based on the early release of the publication data. Moreover, the USPTO did not record in its records that a publication occurred until November 18, 2010. Copies of, and access to, any of the affected applications described in this document were not provided by the USPTO under 37 CFR 1.14 based on the error described in this document. The USPTO regrets this error and is instituting controls to prevent similar processing errors in the future.

Inquiries regarding this matter may be directed to Mark Polutta, Senior Legal Advisor, Office of Patent Legal Administration at (571) 272-7709 or via email addressed to mark.polutta@uspto.gov.

 

One response to “USPTO Issues Mea Culpa: Some Patent Application Information Made Available Too Early (And Not Through Wikileaks)”

  1. Joe Felber Avatar
    Joe Felber

    Dan,
    I am also impressed with the U.S. PTO response to its mistake. Kudos to Kappos!
    You indicated that you were curious if any foreign applications were or will be adversely affected by the premature disclosure. I thought of the following scenario:
    An applicant files in the U.S. first and decides not to file elsewhere within a year claiming Paris Convention or PCT priority to the U.S. application. This can easily happen due to lack interest or funding. However, the applicant decides later (or receives funding/interest) after the first year to file in another jurisdiction. If there was no public disclosure of the invention, many foreign jurisdictions may allow this up to the U.S. publication date, which is usually about another half year from the day it became no longer possible to claim Paris Convention or PCT priority.
    Under these facts, the applicant and its foreign counsel think it is an option to file any time up to Nov. 18 (Nov. 17 some places?), because there won’t be a U.S. publication to serve as prior art. As is quite common, everyone is busy and the application is not ready for filing a whole week before the due date (that is, what everyone thought was the due date). Thus, the application is filed in the foreign jurisdiction after Nov. 11, although before Nov. 18, and the premature publication becomes prior art.
    I also suspect that very few applicants will be affected by the mistake. However, we may want to remember this in case a client comes to us in the future for a validity analysis of a non-U.S. patent filed between Nov. 11 and Nov. 18, if does not claim Paris Convention or PCT priority, and especially if the inventors and/or assignee are Americans. You can just imagine Free Patents Online or the PTO being subpoenaed for its records.
    Joe Felber

    Like

Leave a comment

Navigation

About

I’m Dan Feigelson. I’ve been practicing patent law for over 30 years. I’m also opinionated, as you may discover in reading my writings here.