America-Israel Patent Law Blog

Observations on patents and other IP from a dual-licensed practitioner

,

Does the Recent U.S. Patent Reform Prove that American Politicians are the Best That Money Can Buy?

Us_senate_seal.png Ok, notwithstanding the catchy title, my intent here is not to indict all members of Congress who voted in favor the recently-enacted “America Invents Act”, the real title of which is the “America Invents New Ways to Obfuscate and Complicate Patent Law Act”. I just want to shed a little light on one of those members, namely Carl Levin, the senior Senator from my home state of Michigan.

Mr. Levin, a democrat, was elected to the Senate in 1978 and has been reelected every six years since then. He’s generally not been a flashy Senator. He first got my attention when I wrote his office while the Obamacare bill was being considered. The bill as drafted contained a provision that would have forced expats to buy health insurance for all members of their households at a cost of $750 per person. But as ex-pats they wouldn’t have been able to use the insurance. So I emailed his office to complain about that. When I eventually received a response – several weeks later – it was completely off target, relating to issues I hadn’t raised and not addressing the one I had. Let’s just say this is not the way to try to win over this particular voter (although the provision that concerned me was eventually dropped from the bill).

Then in the spring of 2010, Senator Levin got himself a boatload of publicity when, as chairman of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, he excoriated senior members of Goldman Sachs over their role in the financial meltdown of 2008, using some colorful language that U.S. Senators tend not to use in public.

Had the Senator taken steps in 2006 and 2007 to ensure that the meltdown never happened, I might have been impressed. Here, given that the gate had been left wide open and the horse had left the barn long before, it was obviously just posturing (but it sure made for a good sound bite!). Which is why it came as no surprise when last month that same expletive-spewing Senator Levin voted in favor of the AIA, including its tailor-made provisions to protect the banking industry from patent infringement lawsuits. Those provisions were a response to litigation instituted by DataTreasury, a company (some would say patent troll) that had patents covering check processing methods and that sued several banks for infringement. Oh, those pesky trolls! If you’ve got the money to buy legislation, why should you have to suffer those trolls, or even legitimate inventors, like everyone else does? The new law makes it easier for banks to challenge such patents and to keep them tied up in proceedings before the USPTO, with litigation frozen for the duration. One wonders if after the public dressing-down Senator Levin gave the Goldman guys, they privately made up – and we’re not talking simply doing a pinky handshake and saying “shalom shalom kol hazman, brogez brogez af paam” like little kids here in Israel do.

Not only isn’t it surprising that the Senator voted in favor of the AIA, it was pretty much a foregone conclusion, as the AIA includes some classic pork: the establishment of a USPTO satellite office in Michigan, which should be good for a few hundred jobs; plus the establishment of prior user rights, which will effectively let the auto companies implement new processes and equipment that they maintain as trade secrets, then in certain instances use that same secret implementation as a defense to a charge of patent infringement.

The icing on the cake came in the form of this press release from Senator Levin’s office, the first sentence of which reads: “After years of work to ban patents on tax shelters, Sen. Carl Levin’s legislative efforts became law when, on Friday, September 16, 2011, President Obama signed the America Invests Act and cited U.S. patent reform as a key component in job growth”. It’s not a typo: the bill is referred to later in the press release by the same name. Impressive.

Keep up the good work, Senator. It’s comforting to know that if I ever become obscenely rich and need some legislation to help me keep my gelt, I’ll have a sympathetic ear.

2 responses to “Does the Recent U.S. Patent Reform Prove that American Politicians are the Best That Money Can Buy?”

  1. staff Avatar

    If Congress members who voted for the bill were not guilty of corruption, they are nonetheless culpable for having voted for a bill that does great harm to American jobs.
    They should have called the bill the America STOPS Inventing Act or ASIA, because that’s where it is sending all our jobs.
    “This is not a patent reform bill” Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA) complained, despite other democrats praising the overhaul. “This is a big corporation patent giveaway that tramples on the right of small inventors.”
    “patent reform”
    Senator Cantwell is right. Just because they call it “reform” doesn’t mean it is. The agents of banks, huge multinationals, and China are at it again trying to brain wash and bankrupt America.
    The patent bill is nothing less than another monumental federal giveaway for banks, huge multinationals, and China and an off shoring job killing nightmare for America. Even the leading patent expert in China has stated the bill will help them steal our inventions. Who are the supporters of this bill working for??
    Patent reform is a fraud on America. This bill will not do what they claim it will. What it will do is help large multinational corporations maintain their monopolies by robbing and killing their small entity and startup competitors (so it will do exactly what the large multinationals paid for) and with them the jobs they would have created. The bill will make it harder and more expensive for small firms to get and enforce their patents. Without patents we cant get funded. Yet small entities create the lion’s share of new jobs. According to recent studies by the Kauffman Foundation and economists at the U.S. Census Bureau, “startups aren’t everything when it comes to job growth. They’re the only thing.” This bill is a wholesale slaughter of US jobs. Those wishing to help fight this bill should contact us as below.
    Small entities and inventors have been given far too little voice on this bill when one considers that they rely far more heavily on the patent system than do large firms who can control their markets by their size alone. The smaller the firm, the more they rely on patents -especially startups and individual inventors. Congress tinkering with patent law while gagging inventors is like a surgeon operating before examining the patient.
    Please see http://truereform.piausa.org/default.html for a different/opposing view on patent reform.
    http://docs.piausa.org/

    Like

  2. patent litigation Avatar

    It’s too bad that the U.S. Congress didn’t do its part by enacting the patent reform bill that almost everyone wanted — one that would have ended the diversion of USPTO fees to the legislature. But then, I guess that’s what happens when you let foxes guard the henhouse.
    http://www.aminn.org/

    Like

Leave a comment

Navigation

About

I’m Dan Feigelson. I’ve been practicing patent law for over 30 years. I’m also opinionated, as you may discover in reading my writings here.